(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-17 05:24 am (UTC)
djonn: Self-portrait, May 2025 (Default)
From: [personal profile] djonn
We're talking about two different qualitative things here. It's not a transitive/intransitive thing, it's whether you're talking about shining as in "polishing things" (i.e. shoes or silver), or shining as in giving off or reflecting light (i.e. the sun or a mirror). Thus:

The past tense of polishing-shining is "shined". The past tense of glowing-shining is "shone".

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-17 06:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateyule.livejournal.com
Shouldn't that last option be "Oooh! Shiny!" ?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-17 07:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] billeyler.livejournal.com
We LOVE English...

Shake, shook, shaken
Take, took, taken
Bake, book, baken
Make, mook, maken
Rake, rook, raken
Fake, fook, faken....

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-17 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joshenglish.livejournal.com
I hate having to jump into a dictionary to check my answer, but MW.com lists the distinction as transitive/intransitive, so both the third and forth choices point to the same thing, don't they?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-18 04:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffsoesbe.livejournal.com
past tense of "shine" is "shine on"

you crazy diamond, you

Actually ...

Date: 2007-07-27 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sailorjim.livejournal.com
The past tense of shine is dull, if my car is any indication.

Profile

davidlevine: (Default)
David D. Levine

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 282930  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags